Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Google to Phase Out Android Instant Apps by December 2025

Google to Phase Out Android Instant Apps by December 2025

Google has announced plans to effectively discontinue its Android Instant Apps feature by December 2025, a move attributed to the feature's low usage rates and lack of adoption among users. Instant Apps aimed to provide a lightweight, app-like experience without the need for installation, allowing users to quickly access parts of an application. However, as interest dwindled, Google has decided to focus on more effective tools to enhance user engagement and developer productivity.

The announcement surfaced in a recent canary build of Android Studio, where developer Leon Omelan reported a pop-up alert stating, "Instant Apps support will be removed by Google Play in December 2025. Publishing and all Google Play Instant APIs will no longer work. Tooling support will be removed in Android Studio Otter Feature Drop." This reveals a clear trajectory towards the conclusion of support for a feature that was first launched in 2017.

During its inception, Instant Apps was touted as a promising innovation intended to streamline app discovery and engagement. Users could enable the feature on their devices, and tapping a link in Google Search would instantly open a lightweight version of an app without the additional step of installation. This capability closely parallels Apple’s App Clips, designed for rapid access to specific app functions such as bill payment or game demos.

Despite its initial appeal, the functionality struggled to capture significant interest from developers. The requirement for developers to create tailored, slimmer versions of their applications—and the limitation of a maximum size of 15MB—proved a significant barrier. As a result, only a limited number of applications, with Vimeo and Wish among the earliest adopters, ever integrated Instant App support.

Moreover, recent dialogues indicate that developers have opted to use alternative tools for app discovery that promote more comprehensive engagement, such as AI-powered installations and conventional app distribution through the Play Store. Nia Carter, a spokesperson for Google, stated, "Usage and engagement of Instant Apps have been low, and developers are leveraging other tools for app discovery. This change allows us to invest more in the tools that are working well for developers, helping direct users to full app downloads to foster deeper engagement."

As Google approaches the removal deadline, it’s likely that most consumers will remain largely unaffected, as fewer users had actively engaged with Instant Apps. The decision to prioritize web-based tools, alongside potentially more streamlined app experiences, reflects a broader strategy aimed at increasing user interaction and satisfaction. Following the trend of discontinuing less successful features—such as the replacement of Chromecast with the Google TV streamer—this move underscores Google's commitment to refining its product offerings in response to user feedback and developer needs.

While the sunset of Instant Apps signals the end of an underwhelming chapter in app development, it highlights the tech giant's ongoing evolution in meeting the dynamic landscape of user behavior and technological advancements.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
10/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   10   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article maintains objectivity while discussing Google's decision to eliminate Instant Apps. It presents facts regarding usage statistics and Google's rationale without favoring any particular side, thus resulting in a low bias score.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: